|
The Fairhair dynasty ((ノルウェー語:Hårfagreætta)) was a family of kings founded by Harald I of Norway which united and ruled Norway with few interruptions from the latter half of the 9th century to 1387 (traditional view), or through only three generations of kings ending with Harald Greycloak in the late 10th century (the view of many modern scholars). ==Dynasty itself: traditional view vs artificial construct== The Fairhair Dynasty is traditionally regarded as the first royal dynasty of the united kingdom of Norway. It was founded by Harald I of Norway, known as ''Haraldr hinn hárfagri'' (Harald Fairhair or Finehair), the first King of Norway (as opposed to "in Norway"), who defeated the last resisting petty kings at the Battle of Hafrsfjord in 872. According to the traditional view, after Harald Fairhair first unified the kingdom, Norway was inherited by his agnatic (male) descendants. In the 13th century, this was codified in law. Unlike other Scandinavian monarchies and Anglo-Saxon England, Norway was never an elective monarchy. However, in the first centuries after Harald Fairhair, there were several periods during which the country was effectively ruled not by a king but by one of the Jarls of Lade, (Old Norse ''Hlaðir''), from the northern part of Norway. The first such period was from about 975 to about 995 under Haakon Sigurdsson (Hákon Sigurðarson, often called 'Jarl Haakon'). Also, although Harald Fairhair's kingdom was the kernel of a unified Norway, it was still small and his power centre was in Vestfold, in the south. And when he died, the kingdom was divided between his sons. Some historians put emphasis on the actual monarchical control over the country and assert that Olav II (Olav the Stout, who later became St. Olav), who reigned from 1015, was the first king to have control over the entire country. He is generally held to be the driving force behind Norway's final conversion to Christianity and was later revered as ''Rex Perpetuum Norvegiæ'' (Latin: eternal king of Norway).〔Arno Borst, ''Medieval Worlds : Barbarians, Heretics, and Artists in the Middle Ages'', University of Chicago, 1992, ISBN 0-226-06656-8, (p. 132 ).〕〔The phrase is first recorded in the contemporary ''Historia Norwegiæ'' - Knut Helle, ''The Cambridge History of Scandinavia'' Volume 1, ''Prehistory to 1520'', Cambridge University Press, 2003, ISBN 0-521-47299-7, (p. 379 ).〕 Some provinces did not actually come under the rule of the Fairhair kings before the time of Harald III (Harald Hardrada, r. 1046–1066). Either of these may therefore be regarded as further unifiers of Norway. And some of the rulers were nominally or actually vassals of the King of Denmark, including Jarl Haakon. It is undisputed that later kings, until Magnus IV (Magnus the Blind, r. 1130–1135 and 1137–1139), were descended from Harald Hardrada: the 'Hardrada dynasty'. However, many modern historians doubt whether Harald III was in fact descended from Harald Fairhair (for example questioning the identification of Halfdan in Hadafylke with the father of Sigurd Syr〔M. Sjöström, "Scandinavian medieval descendants of Charlemagne: A detailed genealogy of the issue of Agnes Haakonsdottir, of the so-called Fairhair dynasty", ''Foundations - Journal of the Foundation for Medieval Genealogy'' vol 2 (2007:4, July), pp. 253-276: "It is very likely that the lord Halvdan, father of kinglet Sigurd Syr, was not identical with a possible Halvdan in Hadafylke, grandson of king Harald".〕 or Harald Fairhair's fathering of Sigurd Hrise on a Sami girl called Snæfrid〔Helle, (p. 191 ).〕) and whether he in fact made such a claim, or whether this lineage is a construction from the 12th century. Sverre Sigurdsson's claim to be the son of Sigurd Munn is also usually considered to be false, which would make Inge II (Inge Bårdsson) the last king of a dynasty. Scholars now consider the Fairhair dynasty at least partly the product of medieval invention.〔Helle, (p. 185 ).〕〔Birgit and Peter Sawyer, ''Medieval Scandinavia: from Conversion to Reformation, circa 800-1500'', Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993, ISBN 0-8166-1738-4, (p. 61 ).〕 One motive would be to increase the legitimacy of rulers by giving them a clear royal ancestry dating back to the foundation of the kingdom. Another was to provide pedigrees for other people by connecting them to the royal house. Versions of the royal descent are preserved in various works by Icelandic skalds and historians, some based on now lost works: Þjóðólfr of Hvinir's ''Ynglingatal'', in ''Nóregs konungatal'' (which preserves information from a lost work by Sæmundr fróði), and at greatest length in Snorri Sturluson's ''Heimskringla'' (which preserves information from a now lost version of Ari Þorgilsson's ''Íslendingabók''). These differ in some respects. Joan Turville-Petre explored the relationship between them and argued that the original aims were to establish a framework of regnal years for dating and to connect Icelandic chieftains to them,〔Joan Turville-Petre, "The Genealogist and History: Ari to Snorri", ''Saga-Book'' 20 (1978-81), pp. 7-23 ((pdf )), especially pp. 8, (10: "The numbers suggest that this was a professional genealogical document, made up in sets of ten generations" ).〕 and that the Vestfold origin of the dynasty was deliberately altered and they were connected to the Swedish Ynglings rather than the Skjǫldungs to fit Icelandic tradition.〔Turville-Petre, (pp. 14 ): "According to ''Ynglingatal'', the first five members were all buried in Vestfold; which implies that this was the centre of their power. Yet Ari entitles the first member ''Upplendingakonungr''. In Icelandic historical tradition the emphasis is on the mountain regions"; (15 ): "The Skjǫldungs were not in question . . . ; the Ynglings of Sweden were chosen".〕 Claus Krag argued that an important motive was to establish a hereditary claim to ''Viken'', the region around Oslo, because the area had been paying taxes to the King of Denmark.〔Claus Krag, ''Ynglingatal og Ynglingasaga: en studie i historiske kilder'', Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1991, OCLC 256562288, (pp. 231, 243 ) 〕 Turville-Petre speaks of a "decisive reconstruction of Harald ()'s ancestry probably carried out by Icelanders, some two hundred years after his time" which made Halfdan the Black the progenitor of a dynasty which stretched in three branches from Harald Fairhair to Olaf Tryggvason, Olav II and Harald.〔Turville-Petre, (p. 15 )〕 - in fulfillment of prophetic dreams, according to ''Heimskringla'', in which the genealogy reaches its full form. One particular point of doubt raised by historians is whether Harald III's father was actually descended in unbroken male line from a younger (and somewhat obscure) son of Harald Fairhair,〔Sjöström, for example, regards this as evidence of later invention: "()he male-line descent of Sigurd Syr from Harald Fairhair/Schönhaar is very uncertain, redolent of a later, possibly 12th-century, creation in support of the established royal Hardraada dynasty's legitimacy claims".〕 and Olav II in another obscure but unbroken male line. It has been suggested that their claims to the throne were bolstered by genealogical invention because although they shared the same mother, Åsta Gudbrandsdatter, the mother's descent was unimportant in inheritance according to traditional Germanic law. In this critical view, only three generations of Fairhair kings reigned, from 930 to 1030, for 40 years altogether. The kings Olav Tryggvason and St. Olav, their family ties with the Fairhair dynasty perhaps a 12th-century invention, ruled for 18 years altogether and Harald Hardrada then founded a new dynasty. There may be as many as 6 dynasties altogether subsumed under the title of Fairhair dynasty: Harald Fairhair's, Olav Tryggvason's, St. Olav's, Harald Hardrada's, Magnus Erlingsson's and Sverre's.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Fairhair dynasty」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|